We’re used to seeing shedding political candidates come again and check out once more. Even after they provide a concession by saying that “the voters have spoken” and demand that they’ve run their remaining race, it’s hardly stunning when a vanquished challenger decides someplace down the highway that it’s price one other shot.
However poll measures are completely different.
Deep-pocketed teams that rigorously contemplate the prevailing political winds and, in some instances, spend years gearing up for a statewide battle don’t usually do it throughout in the event that they lose — to say nothing of attempting a third time. In spite of everything, why would voters immediately change their minds and embrace what they’ve already rejected?
It’s a query Dave Regan has heard earlier than.
Asking voters to redo the do-over on kidney dialysis
“We’re cussed sufficient that we’re going to hold in there,” stated Regan, the chief of SEIU United Healthcare Employees West, the backer of all three efforts to vary the foundations beneath which non-public, for-profit kidney dialysis clinics function in California.
The healthcare employees union has till subsequent week to assemble not less than 623,212 verified voter signatures wanted to qualify its third proposal within the final 4 years. A half-dozen or extra different poll measure efforts — together with sweeping efforts to legalize sports activities betting and rewrite state tax coverage — additionally will quickly wrap up what have been costly petition drives.
Native elections officers want a few months to examine and confirm signatures, and Secretary of State Shirley Weber will certify the Nov. 8 poll measures in late June.
For Regan’s union, there’s hope that the third time would be the allure. The primary two efforts had been poll field flops.
In 2018, virtually 60% of voters rejected the primary effort, Proposition 8. The measure would have capped the earnings earned by the operators of dialysis clinics once they exceeded a set threshold. The ensuing marketing campaign was a $130-million slugfest, with many of the cash spent by the 2 corporations that function most of California’s dialysis facilities.
Two years later, the healthcare employees union took a unique strategy. Slightly than deal with earnings, 2020’s Proposition 23 sought to impose new guidelines requiring on-site medical doctors, extra transparency about clinic an infection charges and necessities that some insurance coverage suppliers’ purchasers wouldn’t be refused remedy.
The proposal was completely different however the end result was the identical. Fewer than 4 in 10 ballots had been in favor of Proposition 23, and the price of the marketing campaign topped $113.6 million.
Now, 4 years and virtually 1 / 4 of a billion dollars in marketing campaign spending later, the healthcare union is attempting once more.
The third effort intently mirrors Proposition 23 however loosens the earlier effort to require in-person medical doctors. The proposal now states that as an alternative of a doctor, every clinic can have a nurse practitioner or doctor assistant on responsibility throughout remedy hours — hours that may prolong from early within the morning till late at evening.
“We’re dedicated to reforming this trade,” Regan stated in an interview Thursday. “We’re not going to be bullied simply because the trade has limitless assets” for its political campaigns.
The criticism of the union that’s persevered, and most vocally lodged by the businesses that run the California dialysis clinics, is that the recurring poll measures are principally designed to push the companies into permitting the dialysis clinic employees to unionize.
It’s an accusation that led a consultant of the marketing campaign that’s backed by the 2 huge dialysis corporations, DaVita Inc. and Fresenius Medical Care, to liken the union’s poll measure campaigns to “extortion.”
“The voters clearly perceive this and we’re assured that they’ll once more overwhelmingly reject this harmful abuse of the poll system,” Kathy Fairbanks, a spokesperson for the marketing campaign, stated Thursday.
Regan rejects these accusations and insists the impetus stays a sequence of wanted modifications to dialysis clinic operations.
“It’s not about that,” Regan stated on the problem of enlisting new union members. “It’s about reforming an indefensible a part of the healthcare trade.”
California Republicans collect
Friday marks the kickoff of the California Republican Social gathering’s spring conference, and the occasion raises an fascinating query for political watchers: Who's the state occasion’s standard-bearer?
Lengthy gone are the times when the GOP trustworthy may level towards a distinguished statewide official. The election of then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and then-Insurance coverage Commissioner Steve Poizner in 2006 had been the occasion’s final victories in races for any of California’s eight constitutional workplaces. And the latest statewide voter registration statistics present there are virtually two Democrats for each Republican among the many state’s registered citizens.
The reply to the query posed earlier might be Home Minority Chief Kevin McCarthy, who would be the featured speaker on the conference’s Saturday dinner. He's additionally the one distinguished GOP chief on the occasion’s revealed itinerary for the weekend, with lesser-known candidates for governor and different workplaces holding receptions through the occasion in Anaheim.
However some may additionally search for management from Lanhee Chen, the previous GOP presidential advisor and Obama appointee to the Social Safety Advisory Board who now teaches at Stanford. Chen is working for state controller and gained the endorsement Thursday of The Occasions’ editorial board. Chen faces a prolonged checklist of Democrats on the June poll and is prone to advance simply to November.
The final Republican to be elected state controller was Houston Flournoy, who served from 1967 to 1975.
Having fun with this article? Contemplate subscribing to the Los Angeles Occasions
Your help helps us ship the information that issues most. Develop into a subscriber.
California politics lightning spherical
— Six weeks after Gov. Gavin Newsom unveiled a far-reaching effort to push extra individuals into court-ordered remedy for extreme psychological sickness and dependancy, homeless advocates are calling it legally misguided and immoral.
— Meals banks throughout California are seeing an inflow of latest faces and are asking state lawmakers for assist.
— California lawmakers have superior a measure that will make it simpler to skirt a federal regulation with the intention to sue gun makers.
— “It’s not as dangerous because it appears to be like.” Columnist Mark Z. Barabak appears to be like in on Sen. Alex Padilla and life within the U.S. Senate.
Keep in contact
Did somebody ahead you this? Enroll right here to get California Politics in your inbox.
Till subsequent time, ship your feedback, recommendations and information tricks to politics@latimes.com.
Post a Comment