Highway Code 'entirely fails' to share burden of responsibility with cyclists, drivers fume

The latest modifications to the Freeway Code have been slammed by a British drivers’ alliance.

Freeway Code rules have been tweaked earlier this yr “to enhance the protection of individuals strolling, biking and using horses".

However the modifications have "fully failed in creating a way of shared accountability for the protection of all street customers," in response to the Alliance of British Drivers.

In a report printed on the Authorities's web site, drivers are advised to “go away not less than 1.5 metres (5 ft) when overtaking individuals biking at speeds of as much as 30mph, and giving them more room when overtaking at greater speeds".

The recent rules additionally urge drivers to “wait behind them (cyclists) and don't overtake if it’s unsafe or not attainable to fulfill these clearances".

However the Alliance of British Drivers, a non-profit organisation that lobbies "for motorists' pursuits" says the recent guidelines have “launched an unhelpful ambiance of divisiveness that has created a false sense of ‘winners and losers”.

The Highway Code was tweaked earlier this year
The Freeway Code was tweaked earlier this yr
Kirsty O'Connor

Talking solely for GB Information, Duncan White, a Director for the alliance stated: “The Alliance of British Drivers has all the time maintained that the protection of all street customers is the paramount consideration; we're nevertheless involved that the newest version of the Freeway Code has not created a balanced appreciation of the realities of street use.

“Our latest dialogue with Baroness Vere on the Division of Transport has bolstered our view that the newest model of the Freeway Code is open to a broad vary of interpretations and assumptions which has not contributed to a readability of understanding of the revised ‘guidelines of the street’.

“The Alliance of British Drivers campaigns tirelessly for the protection of our roads. It's a matter of a lot remorse that as an alternative of bringing all street customers collectively in the reason for security, the revised Freeway Code has launched an unhelpful ambiance of divisiveness that has created a false sense of ‘winners and losers’ moderately than selling mutual accountability in how all of us use our roads. This isn't in anybody’s curiosity.”

He continued: “The very prescriptive ‘hierarchy’ of street customers graphically illustrated within the new Freeway Code has created a tangible change in attitudes that has provoked robust reactions in some quarters.

“Smart street customers have all the time appreciated that the bigger the car, the potential for better harm and the overwhelming majority act in a accountable means in appreciating this very apparent state of affairs.

The Highway Code debate has been heightened by an incident involving a Land Rover and cyclist
The Freeway Code debate has been heightened by an incident involving a Land Rover and bike owner
Northamptonshire Police

“Because the publication of the revised Freeway Code we've got seen a change in attitudes and this has led to some very provocative behaviour on our roads which have, on events, been interpreted by some as a deliberate act of obstruction.

“This has not improved etiquette nor does it mirror absolutely the requirement for particular person accountability to maintain our roads as secure as attainable for all customers.

“If one sector of street customers are given the impression that provocative, obstructive and difficult behaviour has advantage then the revised Freeway Code has fully failed in creating a way of shared accountability for the protection of all street customers.

“For Ministers of the Crown to disclaim such shifts in angle regardless of written and visible proof then we've got an institutional failure to understand the adverse influence of unwarranted modifications within the Freeway Code.

“When sure sectors of street customers publicly state that they'd a disproportionate influence on re-drafting our collective ‘guidelines of the street’ to their particular benefit and but that is denied by Ministers regardless of the proof, then we clearly have developed a really lop-sided understanding of equitable insurance policies for the protection of all.”

The Freeway Code debate has been heightened by a viral incident between a bike owner and Land Rover in Northamptonshire final month.

The video, which was shared on-line, confirmed a lady falling off her bike right into a ditch after the Land Rover drove previous on a rustic lane.

The Land Rover driver, Paul Nigel Miley, 52 was slapped with a high-quality of £1,008 for driving with out due care and a focus.

The video brought about widespread controversy throughout social media as many defended Miley saying he did nothing improper and that the bike owner was the truth is at fault, sparking offended responses from biking teams.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post