Wagatha Christie ruling due tomorrow in Rebekah Vardy and Coleen Rooney High Court legal battle

Rebekah Vardy and Coleen Rooney are on account of discover out who has received their Excessive Courtroom libel battle within the “Wagatha Christie” case.

In a viral social media put up in October 2019, Mrs Rooney, 36, mentioned she had carried out a “sting operation” and accused Mrs Vardy, 40, of leaking “false tales” about her personal life to the press.

The spouse of former England star Wayne Rooney publicly claimed Mrs Vardy’s account was the supply behind three pretend tales she had posted on her personal Instagram account.

Mrs Vardy, who's married to Leicester striker Jamie Vardy, denied leaking the tales and sued her fellow footballer’s spouse for libel, whereas Mrs Rooney defended the declare on the idea her put up was “considerably true”.

Rebekah and Jamie Vardy leaves the Royal Courts Of Justice, London
Rebekah and Jamie Vardy leaves the Royal Courts Of Justice, London
Yui Mok

After a highly-publicised libel trial in Could, decide Mrs Justice Steyn is now on account of publish her ruling on Friday.

Over seven days in courtroom quantity 13 on the Royal Courts of Justice, the 2 footballers’ wives every gave proof as revelations from the case made every day headlines throughout the British press.

Through the trial, Mrs Rooney’s barrister David Sherborne argued that Mrs Vardy had a “ordinary and established observe” of leaking details about these she knew – by her buddy and former agent Caroline Watt – to The Solar newspaper.

Discussing Mrs Rooney’s viral “reveal” put up, her barrister added: “It's what she believed on the time… and it's what she believes much more so now that we have now received to the tip of the case.”

Coleen and Wayne Rooney leaves the Royal Courts Of Justice, London
Coleen and Wayne Rooney leaves the Royal Courts Of Justice, London
Yui Mok

Nevertheless, Hugh Tomlinson QC, for Mrs Vardy, mentioned Mrs Rooney had “failed to supply any proof” that Mrs Vardy had “frequently and often abused her standing as a trusted follower” of her personal Instagram account by passing on info from it to The Solar.

Mr Tomlinson mentioned the libel battle was a “quite simple case” when “one clears away the conspiracy theories”.

He added: “Mrs Vardy’s case is and at all times has been that she didn't leak the data nor did she authorise anybody else to leak.

“She doesn't know to at the present time what occurred,” Mr Tomlinson mentioned, including: “She doesn't know the place this info got here from.”

The barrister added that Mrs Vardy suffered “very severe hurt to her repute” on account of Mrs Rooney’s put up.

The judgment is because of be handed down by Mrs Justice Steyn at 12pm on Friday.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post