Keystone XL oil pipeline: What you need to know about the dispute

The cosponsors of the Keystone XL bill, Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.), left, and Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.), had hoped to expedite the oil pipeline’s construction.
The cosponsors of the Keystone XL invoice, Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.), left, and Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.), had hoped to expedite the oil pipeline’s building.
(J. Scott Applewhite / Related Press)

One of many largest environmental controversies of the Obama administration bought locked up in Congress once more this week, when the Republican-controlled Senate didn't override President Obama’s current veto of laws that might have pressured a call on the Keystone XL pipeline.

From the halls of Congress to courthouses in heartland states, the challenge has created a stark divide. Critics imagine the deliberate 1,179-mile pipeline undermines efforts to sluggish local weather change and will threaten a vital aquifer. However, building of the pipeline would undoubtedly create jobs. However what then?

With debate over the pipeline nearing its peak, right here’s some background:

What's the Keystone XL pipeline?

Its genesis was within the early 2000s, when oil costs rose and the extraction of petroleum from the distant tar sands in northern Canada turned profitable. Oil corporations wanted a fast solution to transport the oil to refineries on the Gulf Coast, and so they argue that a pipeline is the quickest, least expensive, most secure means. TransCanada Corp., a Calgary-based vitality infrastructure agency, hopes to increase a 36-inch-wide pipeline 1,179 miles from Alberta, Canada, to Steele Metropolis, Neb. The corporate estimates it would value about $8 billion and can transport 830,000 barrels of oil every day to refineries in Texas.

Keystone XL is the final of 4 phases of a bigger Keystone pipeline system.

In 2008, TransCanada obtained approval from the Bush administration for an preliminary part, in addition to authorization from a number of states alongside the route of 1 a part of the pipeline. That first part linked 2,147 miles of pipeline between Hardisty, Alberta; Steele Metropolis, and Patoka, Sick. It was accomplished in 2010. The second part added about 300 miles between Steele Metropolis and Cushing, Okla. That was accomplished in 2011. A 3rd part in 2014 linked 487 miles of pipeline from Cushing to Port Arthur, Texas. (A smaller lateral extension from Port Arthur to Houston is scheduled to be accomplished this 12 months.)

What are tar sands, and the way are they totally different from oil transported by different pipelines?

Tar sands, often known as oil sands, are a mix of principally sand, clay, water and a thick, viscous substance known as bitumen. Bitumen is manufactured from hydrocarbons and is used to supply gasoline and different petroleum merchandise.

Extracting bitumen from tar sands — and refining it into merchandise like gasoline — is costlier and tougher than extracting and refining liquid oil.

What's the argument for establishing Keystone XL?

TransCanada notes that the pipeline might assist cut back the quantity of oil america imports from the Center East and South America.

There are different financial advantages: A U.S. State Division report estimates that about 42,000 jobs shall be created throughout its building. Nevertheless, the identical report notes that solely 35 of them can be everlasting.

A pipeline ships sooner than trains, which in any case don’t have the capability to deal with as a lot oil as a pipeline. And pipeline backers say trains are extra hazardous than a pipeline due to the chance of accidents and oil spills. Latest accidents in West Virginia, South Dakota and elsewhere have been used as ammunition by pipeline supporters.

Why has it been so controversial?

Nebraska has been a key space of controversy. On its present proposed path, the ultimate part of the pipeline passes northeast of the Nebraska Sandhills and over the Ogallala Aquifer, a 225,000-square-mile underground pool that runs from South Dakota to Texas. Environmentalists and ranchers worry that leaks might contaminate the aquifer, which gives ingesting water to thousands and thousands of People in heartland states. TransCanada notes the route of the pipeline runs properly east of many of the aquifer.

Local weather change is one other subject. Greenhouse fuel emissions are at the very least 8% increased for oil extracted from tar sands than standard crude, and presumably extra. Conservationists argue that time and money spent extracting oil could possibly be used on extra climate-friendly sources of vitality, similar to wind and photo voltaic.

Environmentalists additionally argue that oil sands crude is extra corrosive and poisonous than standard crude oil, subsequently making a spill extra damaging. TransCanada has pointed to different scientific experiences refuting this.

What was occurring within the Nebraska court docket case?

A 2012 legislation allowed Nebraska’s governor on the time, Dave Heineman, to bypass the state’s Public Service Fee and provides the pipeline a go-ahead by means of the state. A 12 months in the past, a state court docket dominated that this legislation was unconstitutional, leaving the pipeline with no authorised route by means of Nebraska. The state Supreme Courtroom reversed that call in February, ruling that the governor can certainly approve the pipeline’s route. The choice improved prospects for the pipeline, however it nonetheless wants federal approval.

Will the Keystone XL pipeline make the U.S. much less depending on international oil?

TransCanada says sure. Of the greater than 15 million barrels of oil the U.S. consumes every day, about 60% are imported from nations like Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. TransCanada says it could displace a lot of the higher-priced oil that Gulf Coast refineries presently import from overseas.

Additionally of word: A couple of quarter of the pipeline’s capability is slated for crude oil produced within the Bakken area of North Dakota and Montana.

Will oil transported by means of Keystone XL be exported?

Many opponents of the pipeline argue that oil shall be transported overseas. Final fall, whereas in Australia, Obama described the pipeline as transport “Canadian oil to world markets, to not america.” However Gulf Coast refineries have signed long-term contracts for Keystone oil, and plenty of specialists imagine they may find yourself refining most if not all the oil shipped by means of Keystone.

What are the transport options if the pipeline isn’t accomplished?

Trains are the primary different, however the rail system doesn’t have the capability for the 830,000 barrels of oil the pipeline is anticipated to hold every day. Vans are even slower. In 2013, america shipped about 8.3 billion barrels of crude oil, in response to the Assn. of Oil Pipelines. Trains carried solely about 291 million barrels of oil that 12 months, in response to the Assn. of American Railroads.

What's the political break up on this subject?

A 2014 Pew survey discovered that 61% of People help building of Keystone XL, whereas 27% are opposed. Amongst Republicans, 84% help building however solely 49% of Democrats favor it.

Why did President Obama veto a invoice that might have expedited the pipeline’s building?

As a result of the pipeline crosses a global border, the U.S. State Division is reviewing the proposal to resolve whether or not it serves america’ nationwide pursuits. Obama has persistently stated that he would permit the overview to run its course earlier than he decides whether or not the pipeline ought to go ahead. Nevertheless, Republicans in Congress need to bypass that course of and subject a direct allow. A measure that might have pressured Obama to decide on the pipeline handed the Republican-controlled Congress in February. It was among the many first measures handed by the brand new Congress after Republicans noticed sweeping victories within the midterm election.

Obama, as promised, vetoed the measure. The State Division continues to overview the advantages and dangers related to the pipeline plan. That overview ought to be accomplished this 12 months. Obama might nonetheless provide a allow to green-light the pipeline as soon as the State Division course of is full.

What’s subsequent within the pipeline debate?

Within the quick time period, Republicans have vowed to connect a model of the Keystone invoice to a future appropriations measure, which might make it tough for Obama to veto.

kurtis.lee@latimes.com

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post